The structure of crisis networks determines their effectiveness. Random connections create weak networks; deliberate topology creates powerful ones.
The Hub and Spoke Trap
Many build networks with themselves as central hub—all connections flow through them. This feels powerful but creates fatal brittleness. If the hub fails, the network collapses.
Initially, Rachel built a hub network. She connected everyone but kept herself central. When personal crisis prevented her from coordinating, the network became useless. She rebuilt using mesh topology—everyone connected to multiple others. When her next crisis hit, the network self-organized to help without her coordination.
Small World Architecture
Effective crisis networks balance local clusters with long-range connections. Clusters provide depth and redundancy; long connections provide reach and resources.
Michael architected his network deliberately: - Local clusters: 5-7 person groups with full interconnection - Bridge connections: 2-3 people linking clusters - Long jumps: Direct connections to distant clusters - Weak ties: Loose connections to other networks
This small-world architecture meant any network member could reach any other through maximum three connections, enabling rapid resource mobilization.
Redundant Critical Paths
Single points of failure doom crisis networks. Every critical capability needs multiple providers, every important connection needs backup paths.
Sandra mapped her network's capabilities and identified single points of failure: - Only one person with legal expertise - Single source for technical infrastructure - One primary funding connection
She deliberately recruited redundancy, ensuring every critical capability existed in at least three network members. When crisis eliminated some connections, others remained functional.